<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hedge Crunch Financial &#187; credit crunch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hedgecrunch.com/tag/credit-crunch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hedgecrunch.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:50:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Scaling back lending because of Mortgage Crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.hedgecrunch.com/scaling-back-lending-because-of-mortgage-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hedgecrunch.com/scaling-back-lending-because-of-mortgage-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Heinsman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs Asset Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crunch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hedgecrunch.com/scaling-back-lending-because-of-mortgage-crisis/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ballooning losses from the US mortgage market could force the global financial industry to scale back lending by $2 trillion and trigger a substantial recession, according to a bearish analysis. The startling figure was suggested yesterday by the chief US economist at Goldman Sachs, Jan Hatzius, who said that an estimated $400bn (£290bn) in losses [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ballooning losses from the US mortgage market could force the global financial industry to scale back lending by $2 trillion and trigger a substantial recession, according to a bearish analysis.</p>
<p>The startling figure was suggested yesterday by the chief US economist at Goldman Sachs, Jan Hatzius, who said that an estimated $400bn (£290bn) in losses on mortgages would be magnified as lenders reacted to stay within their solvency requirements.</p>
<p>&#8220;Even a $400bn loss does not look all that large compared to the vast size of the US financial markets, and one sometimes hears that it is just equivalent to one bad day in the stock market,&#8221; Mr Hatzius told clients. &#8220;But this analogy is wrong. There is a big difference between stock market losses, which are mostly borne by long-only investors, and mortgage credit losses, which are mostly borne by leveraged investors such as banks, broker-dealers, hedge funds, and government-sponsored enterprises.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hedgecrunch.com/scaling-back-lending-because-of-mortgage-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JP Morgan not affected by the credit crunch</title>
		<link>http://www.hedgecrunch.com/jp-morgan-not-affected-by-the-credit-crunch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hedgecrunch.com/jp-morgan-not-affected-by-the-credit-crunch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Heinsman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[JPMorgan Asset Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crunch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hedgecrunch.com/jp-morgan-not-affected-by-the-credit-crunch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though three of the top ten largest hedge funds in the US lost an estimated $24 billion in assets last year, the overall assets of the top US hedge funds actually rose in 2007 by more than 33%. JP Morgan topped the list with total assets under management of $44.7 billion dollars. JP Morgan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="verdana" size="2">Even though three of the top ten largest hedge funds in the US lost an estimated $24 billion in assets last year, the overall assets of the top US hedge funds actually rose in 2007 by more than 33%.</font></p>
<p><font face="verdana" size="2">JP Morgan topped the list with total assets under management of $44.7 billion dollars. JP Morgan has a number of hedge funds under its management, including JP Morgan Asset Management and Highbridge Capital Management. JP Morgan topped the list even though they suffered from a loss of $8.5 billion in assets, mainly due to redemptions and some losses in their statistical arbitrage fund.</font></p>
<p><font face="verdana" size="2">Bridgewater Associates was second on the list with total assets under management of $36 billion dollars. They were almost tied with Farallon Capital Management, who boasted a similar figure in total assets.</font></p>
<p><font face="verdana" size="2">Renaissance Technologies came in fourth place with $34 billion dollars, and Och-Ziff Capital Management, the publicly traded hedge fund firm, was in fifth place with $33.2 billion in assets. DE Shaw and Goldman Sachs Asset Management both fell in 2007 due to their exposure to quant funds, and finished up in sixth and seventh place respectively.</font></p>
<p><font face="verdana" size="2">Paulson and Company also soared into the top ten due to their aggressive bets against the subprime mortgage market.</font></p>
<p><font face="verdana" size="2">Many companies that had significant exposure to quant funds managed to recover in the latter part of 2007. The recover continues in 2008, and it will be interesting to see if firms such as Goldman Sachs can start scaling their way back up the list.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hedgecrunch.com/jp-morgan-not-affected-by-the-credit-crunch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

